Freezing foreign assistance makes the U.S. weaker, less safe and less prosperous. Here’s why:

As we know all too well, diseases don’t respect borders. U.S. investments in global health have saved millions of lives — but they also help contain diseases, such as the current Ebola outbreak in Uganda, to keep us safe and healthy here at home. Pausing these programs makes us less safe, to say nothing of the threat it poses to millions of people around the world who rely on U.S.-funded programs for health care that keeps them alive.

Global conflicts, natural disasters and other crises are rampant, and now is the worst time for the U.S. to step away from its role as a global leader. The confusion, instability and loss of trust that the sudden disruption of U.S. support is causing provides an opportunity for America’s adversaries to gain ground.

Foreign assistance doesn’t just support people in need abroad, it also supports American workers and businesses. Many of these aid programs rely on U.S.-made goods, like food and medicine, creating jobs and boosting exports here at home. Pausing foreign assistance disrupts supply chains and puts American jobs at risk, ultimately harming both our economy and our global standing.

At just 1% of the federal budget, for a relatively modest amount of money, this work does a world of good. Sen. Wyden and Merkley, I hope I can count on your support to maintain these vital programs — and the legacy of U.S. leadership.

MICHAEL KALKOFEN

Beaverton